The Essence of "Current" Our bcdW Current Daily Newsletter delivers "One City, One Story" every day. From a curated selection of 18 global cities, we provide diverse perspectives by featuring views from 6 different cities daily.

Connecting Eras In our special Weekend Edition, we bridge the gap between the present and the future by connecting today’s physical cities with the visionary urban landscapes of tomorrow.

Exclusive Collaborator Benefit Members with Collaborator status and above gain direct access to our expertise. You may submit one professional inquiry per day via email, and we guarantee a personalized response within 24 hours.

Mexico City sits on a lake bed. The Aztecs built Tenochtitlán on it in the 14th century. The Spanish drained it in the 17th. The city has been sinking ever since — in some neighborhoods, by as much as 50 centimeters a year. The very act of pumping groundwater accelerates the sinking. The city is consuming the foundation it stands on.

This is not a future problem. It is a present one.

More than 22 million people live in Greater Mexico City. Approximately 20% of them — around 4 million people — have no reliable piped water connection. On any given day, residents in peripheral neighborhoods wait for water trucks that may or may not come. When they do come, residents pay prices per liter that are 10 to 20 times higher than what connected households pay from the tap. In the wealthiest colonias, water flows freely. In Iztapalapa, in Tláhuac, in the hillside settlements of Xochimilco, it does not.

Mexico City has come close to "Day Zero" — the point at which reservoirs run dry and taps go silent across the city — multiple times in the past decade. The Cutzamala system, which supplies roughly 25% of the city's water, draws from reservoirs more than 100 kilometers away and pumps water uphill more than 1,000 meters to reach the city. It is one of the most energy-intensive water supply systems in the world. And it is running out.

The right to water was enshrined in Mexico's constitution in 2012. For the 4 million residents who still lack reliable access, that constitutional right exists on paper and not in their pipes.

The water crisis in Mexico City is not a natural disaster. It is the accumulated result of five centuries of decisions — to drain the lake, to build upward, to pump downward, to expand without infrastructure, to govern water as a political instrument rather than a human right.

The city has the engineering capacity to fix this. What it has not yet found is the political will.

(Sources: UN Water, World Resources Institute, CONAGUA — 2025–2026)

Seoul 🇰🇷 — Seoul's water infrastructure is a point of national pride. The Han River system delivers clean, treated water to nearly 100% of the metropolitan population. Water quality testing happens daily. Tap water in Seoul is safe to drink, which is not the default in most megacities. But Seoul achieved this through decades of sustained public investment — investment that was political as much as technical. The question Seoul's experience raises for Mexico City is not whether the engineering is possible. It is whether a city's political leadership can be held accountable for water as a right, not a service. Seoul's water system was built when Korea was still a developing economy. Mexico City has been waiting for political will that Seoul's mayors decided they could not afford to defer.

London 🇬🇧 — London loses approximately 25% of its water to leaking pipes before it reaches a tap. The Thames Water utility, which supplies most of London, has been under sustained regulatory and financial pressure — billions in debt, infrastructure that dates to the Victorian era, and a regulator demanding massive investment that shareholders have resisted for years. London's water crisis is not one of scarcity or access — it is one of governance and ownership. The question of who owns water infrastructure, and whether private ownership serves public rights, is the sharpest edge of London's water debate. Mexico City's crisis is more severe, but the underlying question is the same: water is a human right. Who is responsible for delivering it? And what happens when they fail?