Current Today is bcdW Magazine's daily newsletter — one story, one city, read through the eyes of the world.

We launch today in test flight. Each edition takes a single real story from one of our cities and asks: what does this mean for someone living somewhere else entirely? What ideas travel? What collaborations become possible?
Let’s get into it →

The average cost of child care in New York City is approximately $20,000 per child per year. For a city worker earning a municipal salary, that is not a line item. It is a decision about whether to stay.

On Monday, Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced that New York City will build a free, on-site child care center inside the David N. Dinkins Municipal Building at 1 Centre Street — one of the largest government office buildings in the world, housing more than 2,000 employees across a dozen agencies. The center will serve children aged six weeks to three years, operate year-round Monday through Friday, and cost families nothing. Applications open April 30. The program begins this fall.

The $10 million renovation is already underway.

This is a pilot. Forty children. One building. A deliberately small first step designed to answer a specific question: can a city government make child care work as a workplace benefit for its own workforce before asking the private sector to do the same?

But the announcement is significant beyond its scale. Mayor Mamdani has been explicit that this program is part of a larger architecture: free 2-K for two-year-olds citywide, universal 3-K expansion, and eventually a city where the cost of raising children is not a reason to leave. The pilot is not the destination. It is the proof of concept.

What makes New York’s move notable is not the policy itself — on-site workplace child care is standard infrastructure in Seoul, Singapore, and dozens of other major cities. What is notable is the location of the pilot. By building the first free child care center inside City Hall’s home building, the Mamdani administration is making a statement: the city will not ask its residents to do what it has not first done for itself.

This is what governing by example looks like. The question is whether the example scales.

(Sources: NYC Mayor’s Office, CBS New York, NBC New York — March 30–April 1, 2026)

Seoul — South Korea has operated a national system of workplace child care centers for decades. Companies above a certain size are legally required to provide child care facilities for their employees — either on-site or through contracted alternatives. Seoul’s corporate districts have child care centers embedded in office towers as a matter of course. What New York is piloting inside the Dinkins Municipal Building, Seoul treats as baseline infrastructure. The gap is not a policy gap. It is a political will gap that New York is now beginning, slowly, to close.

Medellín — Medellín’s approach to urban affordability has always been tied to public investment in care infrastructure — the libraries, the escalators, the community centers were all built on the same logic: cities that want to retain working families must invest in the conditions that make working family life possible. Child care is part of that equation. Medellín’s urban transformation didn’t happen because the city waited for the private sector to solve affordability. It happened because the city decided to build the infrastructure itself. New York is learning the same lesson forty years later.

Austin — Austin’s rapid growth has brought a child care crisis that mirrors New York’s: median household income is rising, but child care costs are rising faster, and the workforce that built the city’s tech economy is making increasingly difficult decisions about whether to stay. Austin has no equivalent of Mamdani’s pilot program. What it does have is a growing coalition of employers — including several major tech firms — who are beginning to treat on-site child care as a talent retention tool. The city government has not yet followed. The Mamdani model is a direct template.

Dallas — Dallas is in a similar position to Austin with one additional variable: the FIFA World Cup this summer will bring 2.7 million visitors to a city that has been aggressively recruiting corporate relocations. One of the most consistent complaints from companies considering Dallas is the absence of the family support infrastructure that employees expect in coastal cities. Child care is near the top of that list. New York’s move — building the infrastructure inside city government first — is a model Dallas could adapt as part of its post-FIFA economic retention strategy.

Tokyo — Tokyo has operated one of the world’s most comprehensive public child care systems for decades, and still faces a waiting list crisis in certain wards due to population density and the complexity of the enrollment system. The city’s response has been to invest heavily in new facilities and streamline applications — not to retreat from the public provision model. What Tokyo demonstrates for New York is the long game: public child care infrastructure requires sustained investment over decades before it achieves the coverage that makes it feel like a right rather than a benefit. New York is at year one. Tokyo is at year forty. The distance between them is time and political will.

Tel Aviv — Tel Aviv has faced its own child care affordability crisis as the city’s tech economy drove up living costs and outpaced public support infrastructure. The Israeli government has expanded child care subsidies in recent years, but the waitlists for subsidized spots in Tel Aviv remain long, and many families in the city’s startup economy rely on employer-provided solutions. What New York’s Mamdani pilot offers Tel Aviv is a specific model: city government as first mover, building the proof of concept in its own workforce before scaling. The employer-led approach Tel Aviv’s tech sector has adopted is the second-best solution. The Mamdani approach is the first.

Your Next Opportunity Is Already Happening — Just Not Where You're Looking

The deal, the partner, the market, the project — it's out there. bcdW connects people who are ready to move with the places, people, and ideas that are ready to receive them. Business opportunities, revenue, partnerships, projects worth joining. Read the magazine that finds the connection before you do.

→ Read bcdW Magazine

Where Will the Olds Live When Everything Changes? We're All Getting There. Today's Old Is Tomorrow's Ours.

We are getting older. All of us. Faster than we planned, longer than we expected, in cities that were never designed for this. Climate is changing everything — heat, water, food, safety. And at the same time, the oldest generation in human history is growing larger, living longer, and asking a question no city has fully answered yet: where do we belong in all of this? Sim Eternal is the project building that story — not as a warning, not as a policy paper, but as a living narrative about the future city told by the people who will live in it the longest. The olds are not the problem. They are the point. And this city is theirs.

→ Visit Sim Eternal City Project

Current runs on one city, one story, every day. But the map is still being drawn.

We are looking for contributors who live and work inside the cities they write about — one story from your city, told the way only a local can tell it. We are also looking for readers who want to add their voice to other cities' stories — benchmarking, similar cases, collaboration ideas, a connection worth making. If a story from Medellín reminds you of something happening in your city, tell us. That response is the whole point.

Right now we are building across the Americas and Asia. But the dream is longer than that — from America to Afro-Eurasia, local to local, city to city, one real connection at a time.

More stories. More cities. More continents.

If you have one, send it.

📩 [email protected]